Policy Governance promotes
the concept of a strong board and a strong executive. It is even more helpful to
think of strong boards, strong executives, and strong chairs. The
chair has the responsibility for all board Means that the board has not kept
It seems to me
that the old approach to governance is one that really didn't delegate much
authority to the chair because the chair's authority was very unclear. The
chair, even more than the executive was always forced to ask for permission
or to seek consensus to move ahead with decisions. This is not true in
Policy Governance. Anything that is unstated in board Means
which are defined by the Board Self-Management Policies is a chair decision.
This means that the chair's role is more than facilitator. It is to
be facilitator for what the board wants to be whole board decisions and to
be the decision maker for all other board Means.
This doesn't mean that the chair can't seek input from the board, but to
make the board decide seems to blur the separation of authority. In Policy Governance, the
board has full control through the Policies to dictate whatever they want.
To assume that they want to decide when they haven't explicitly said so
seems to make the Policies less valuable or meaningful. In other
words, when the chair seeks permission the board gets to speak
unintentionally or individual members get to have a larger voice without
that larger voice being permitted by the whole board.
How does this translate into behavior or
process for the chair and the board? 1.) The chair should be directive
except where limited by the Self-Governance Policies. The chair can seek
input but shouldn't seek permission . The chair still has a
variety of methods to make decisions, such as establishing a committee,
assigning it to an individual, or making a personal decision. However,
to seek the board's decision seems to run counter to the delegation process. 2.) The
chair can differentiate who has authority but
the willingness of the board to put their thoughts into Board
Self-Management Policy. If there is no move to make something a policy or
doesn't become a policy, then it is a suggestion only and should be treated
as such. 3.) If a board wants to put something into written Policy
or discuss putting something into Policy, the chair's responsibility is clearly to help facilitate a group decision.